No dreamer could attempt to deny the extent of teacher comments Rodrigo Montoya Rojas. Until then we could go. But here is a big problem is that the vision that builds your thinking is framed within the Western paradigm of science. For starters. We can not compare the movement of land reclamation by Hugo Blanco, who had claimed features of land ownership, but not a liberation movement, that if he did Luis Felipe De la Puente Uceda.
We have to start looking for a release to incorporate the consolidation of indigenous peoples as true owners of these territories that are beyond the south of the equator. This calls for the release of the means of production from the hands of those who enslave us more than five hundred years and perched and protected by a mercenary army, we will hold sway until now.
can not mix as a liberation movement to successive small groups of opportunists who are perched on the struggles of the 70 and 80 and only sought a fatuous role that allowed them to climb a position within the parliamentary cretinism. For the successive players as Messrs. Barrantes and Patria Roja, the only thing that is pursued only to affirm and sustain the capitalist system because of the living and therefore never seek the release of native peoples from the yoke of Appendix capitalism and U.S. imperialism gendarme. The solution proposed by the teacher Rodrigo Montoya is unworkable, for the same substance that was and will be the left opportunist and careerist essence and sustaining the system, because the change we want to generate, can not prevent that sector, because we always have been entrenched in the system to continue to vegetate at their expense. Why the electoral alliances are always broken, as each will always want to have more part of the teat of the system. None will be resigned to losing their privileges after the conquest to find the rights of our peoples and nations.
Here we must remember that the covenant sought Luis Felipe De la Puente Uceda with the movement of Hugo Blanco, was rejected by the latter, believing that his view of things and the revolution would lead to success and here we must add the version of one of the commanders of the revolutionary epic, you mention the betrayal of the latter, probably with the intention of being the only listed as El Salvador in the nation. Not only that, then tried to restore the line is revolutionary, but it was infiltrated by the same Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) with the joining the ranks of the famous revolutionary Tapia, who is believed Path analyst, but does not say is that it is a paid agent of the CIA.
But why it swings left and revolutionary groups, is that as José Carlos MARIATEGUI said, "Every revolution is a heroic creation." But here in our country we have not observed even one iota of the thought of our Great Amauta. And we have not respected because we have not thoroughly read their texts and we have not made the contrast with the concrete reality that is unfolding in our country. But because we have not read, with the creativity that I had chosen Amauta precisely because we wanted to be creative. We followed the easy path faithfully copying the recipes of other revolutions, without asking, and analyzed according to the analysis tools is that it is easier to copy than to create. Thus the failures and the capitulation of many, but also the path of opportunism to squat can get revenues from the disorientation in the hours of anguish of our people.
first thing is to see our reality from the perspective of Western bourgeois sociology which has bases in Greek philosophy, which follows the Platonic tradition, although they deny it.
The other aspect is the absolute nature of his thought, as also their attitudes, which totally denies the character and vision to develop our cultures, our societies and nations.
why we can say that the independence that took place in these territories was an act totally oblivious to what is actually lived here. But they might ask: What process is lived here a hundred years and 180 years ago, which initiated a process to be alien to most people, it was only a process for a small portion of these settlers and their sources were not precisely in these areas but their economic dependence and politics in Europe. So we have to leave behind if the defects of academic framed in the Western neo-Platonic school and go after what they said amauta and understand the Indian problem as fundamental to understand this territory.
to do so will result in failure as they incur many impromptu pseudo-revolutionaries who seek to implement something that is incongruous to our reality, so from there we can explain the surrender of some revolutionary leaders angry and inflamed. And the reality is they wanted a peasant revolution, where peasants were never, nor will there either. This brought the hair look, but that is not true and here the explanation: I think Western sociology from Western social paradigms that are based precisely on the development of their science paradigms that Western man sustained development. These paradigms are not universal, our territories had a different development to the West although many historians have tried to relate how evolved in parallel, which is not true and for it to have founded religious sects in order to sustain such trends. Or is it true that some addicts insane sustain positions of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It is precisely these wild unscientific that are intended to be breaking down some historical events that will not allow Western schemes enthroned in our territory. So we have to mestizos who do not respond to any frame of mind, but nevertheless they feel after Western positions if it is these that undermine its own existence.
But now we come to what the Master says Rodrigo Montoya, when he says of the alliance between Mr. Barrantes and Mr. García Pérez. That alliance was just not to care for the interests of the majority, but simply to blow up people's hopes on the left. But because many small factions on the left, is because each one wanted to be the bearer of opportunism that is just looking for personal appetite and not the revolutionary struggle, and even many abdicate their ideals and principles for the betterment of their individual person and his environment, is nothing more than another, the petty personal financial interest. Perhaps, where the great leaders of the Left, such as those that bark the "political power grows out of Rifle, with its misogynist Leader Moreno, who switched from first and last names to make it more mysterious his role in deceiving the masses of black paper inside the left. The left of the teacher speaks Manrique has no future because what ultimately seeking not to change the system in favor of the majority, Quite the contrary, live with them and ensure the subsistence system. Nor is consistent
give leadership to the indigenous leader who has shown no hesitation and fortitude to face the problems is the same case of Mr. Guzman to the problem has tried to justify its lack of coherence to the principles of Marxism and lower indication of loss of their flags as he has done is tranza with the enemy. They are ghosts of paper at the least seek not burn and fire risk avoidance, these are not the roads. As I said earlier in a previous article, the way you have to follow.
Yupanqui
Juan Esteban Villalobos. Tupac
Isaac II
http://juanestebanyupanqui.blogspot.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment